When it does a scan using the Similar selection the level of similarity was not possible to set.įrom a user point of view it is not particularly pleasant to use and the fact that it got different results when the selection was a Folder or Folders And Subfolders when it should have been the same result an obvious bug. When the same test was done using the folders and subfolders menu selection it did not find the duplicates, a serious bug. In my first test the files were put in the root directory of a partition and when that folder was scanned it quickly found the duplicates.

Using Timeline many of the selection disappeared, a bit of a surprise. It displays them as thumbnails in a window but to get information you need to select them individually, this makes removing them a tedious business.įrom my own programming experience I know it is difficult to find a useful method of organising the results.Ĭertainly in my second test it would have been better if I could have grouped them by the folder names or paths. In my second test scanned a small partition that I know has many, many duplicate files and it found them.

The program rapidly found that they all had the image same and marked them as duplicates. Installed and registered with ease and opens up a dreary looking mud coloured interface.įor my first test a JPG image was saved with different compression levels it was also resized, all were placed into a single folder.

Duphunter 2.0